SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Neocon who wrote (45211)3/7/2002 2:09:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
Yep. Too bad it was necessary to begin with....



To: Neocon who wrote (45211)3/7/2002 3:12:36 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
Those who impose censorship always have reasons for it, and usually consider it, at least from their point of view, reasonable and fair. That's the way humans are.

Actually, I am not and have not objected to the existence of censored threads, and the post that started all this was not an objection to those threads. Quite the contrary.

I simply made a comment on this thread which said "Hey, I don't think anybody who's still here is stupid. All the stupid ones ran off to the censorship thread. "
Message 17164816

Obviously I hit a nerve, because there were howls of protest. It even led JLA, though the post wasn't addressed to him, to post to me in violation of my frequent requests to him not to do so. So he proved himself not only a censor but a hypocrite. Not that that's anything new, we've know that about him for a while.

But the vehemence of the objections makes clear to me that there is guilt there, the wicked fleeing where no man pursueth.

Frankly, I would be just as happy if JLA went back to the censored threads and stayed there and left this thread to people who believe in free speech in fact, not just in lip service. But of course he won't do that, preferring to stalk me against my desires.



To: Neocon who wrote (45211)3/7/2002 11:36:37 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin  Respond to of 82486
 
<<It was a solution both brilliant and fair>>

Really, 'Neocon?'

Seems that CH is not the only 'scarlet-lettered' by the brilliant and fair-minded free speech advocates.

LOL.

bia