SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Handshake™ who wrote (2572)3/7/2002 4:46:01 PM
From: Bill Ulrich  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
It's the docket sheet that counts. Lawyers can say they intend to do a lot of things. Taking the case of that "sister company" to Medinah, AZNT's lawyers said they were going to prosecute Silicon Investor, Raging Bull, and a plethora of "black corporations". Having the same follow-through skills as Medinah, it of course never happened. Let's stick to the official docket on this case.



To: Handshake™ who wrote (2572)3/7/2002 4:56:16 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Handshake, are you claiming the the clerk lied to me about what was on (and not on) the docket, information that clearly contradicted what Medinah wrote in their "legal update"? If you have any information that contradicts the docket sheet and verifies Medinah's claims, feel free to post it. Otherwise, please save the game of "what if" and "why don't" for the MDMN message boards. Thanks.

- Jeff


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News