SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (154972)3/7/2002 5:43:08 PM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
hadn't heard about it actually -- I'll look for it. Doubt it would have any impact on NG prices. Nuke is baseload. There is some gas baseload, but electric util consumption of NG is not even 20% -- a few nukes cutting back would be a drop in the bucket since Nuke accounts for only a few percent of electric generation -- any such effect would be swamped by weather, IMO.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (154972)3/7/2002 6:28:30 PM
From: robnhood  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
<< supposedly several nuclear plants are being scheduled to reduce capacity this year.>>
You'd never know that trading a stock that I trade a lot of. CCJ. NY, CCO.to. It's on a moon shot.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (154972)3/7/2002 8:11:24 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
KT, >> supposedly several nuclear plants are being scheduled to reduce capacity this year

Would you elaborate on this statement. Am aware that we have more plants this year that will be refueled and have a major maintenance cycle, than the normal 18 month refueling and minor maintenance cycle. Have not heard that we are reducing capacity other than what is caused by this major maintenance cycle.

Joan