SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Michael M who wrote (45263)3/7/2002 5:51:22 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I have a feeling both may have asked SI to
take action


Just to keep the record straight, I never asked SI to take any action against Poet or any post of hers.



To: Michael M who wrote (45263)3/7/2002 5:56:41 PM
From: The Philosopher  Respond to of 82486
 
I can't think of a single reason why any poster should be allowed to muzzle
another poster in any way, for any reason outside the TOU.


I will be interested in seeing what response you get to this.

If any.



To: Michael M who wrote (45263)3/7/2002 6:11:10 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
I think "deals" are stupid- especially when "allegiances" and "friendships" can be of rather short duration here.

People who share private information (which they want to remain "secret") with people they do not know are remiss. While it is good to speak out against caddish and boorish behavior, even if the causation for the boorish or caddish behavior may be entangled, I personally think it is nasty to have groups "punishing" people publicly because they do not "like" what other people have done. I think it begins to slide into that enjoyable, and oh so fun, game of "let's pick a designated victim". The forms of this game on SI seem endless. It must be a fun game to play. It is also true that opinions of bad behavior differ. And CH's behavior pales in comparison to other behaviors I have witnessed (IMO only, of course). But naturally opinions will differ on that. It is just too bad people don't feel strong enough to exercise their own consciences individually.



To: Michael M who wrote (45263)3/7/2002 9:36:10 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 82486
 
I see myself sort of in a parental role. I don't care about justice any longer Michael. I just want QUIET. I don't want to muzzle anyone. I just want them to leave each other alone.....Period.

JLA



To: Michael M who wrote (45263)3/8/2002 9:45:33 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 82486
 
The terms of use are broad, including "otherwise objectionable" posts."To and about" agreements are narrow, and keep both parties on the threads. Thus, there is a basis for them, it seems to me.......