Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (45270)	3/7/2002 6:18:13 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I'm not saying it was a good deal or not a good deal. That wasn't the issue. What I'm saying is that JLA rejected it, which was his right, but then claimed he had accepted it, which was a lie. The reason I made it that way is that I have asked JLA numerous times to stop posting to or about me, but he continues to refuse to honor that request. This whole string started when he came here out of the blue and responded to a post of mine not addressed to or about him. If he doesn't believe that to-or-about limitations should apply to him, why should I agree with him trying to impose them on me? The pointof the offer was that before he can be justified in making demands of other people, he should be prepared to show that he's willing to accept similar demands placed on himself. He obviously wasn't. And of course I haven't been posting to or about Poet anyhow, so the whole issue is in reality, at least at present, a total non-issue except to those who have some burning need to keep bringing it up, and up, and up...