Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (73962)	3/7/2002 8:53:13 PM
From: niceguy767	Respond to of 275872

combjelly: "Now let's be honest. They were several people who accused wanna_bmw of being a paid Intel stooge. Or of being an Intel employee, planted specifically to spin pro-Intel statements. I personally believe that was a little extreme, but considering the glee he takes in piling on on the Intel thread, I declined to defend him. Rightly or wrongly." There is an old saying: "Beware of the wolf in sheep's clothing"...wannab's responses to Ali are sorely lacking in fact from my vantage point...he claims to have received an email from within the castle walls suppoting his slant, and Ali's unfair, from his perspective, for not accepting such as fact...gimme a break, pleaaase...who is the victim, here? "Now he has specifically stated that he didn't care for Intel's focus on MHz as a performance metric. And he rightly has taken AMD to task for being too vague about Quantispeed and the lack of announced progress on TPI. I think he has been overly harsh on his AMD criticism because TPI is pretty worthless without Intel's cooperation, but that is my opinion." Not my interpretation of events...Quantispeed is a multidimensional performance measurement system and MHz is a one dimensional performance measurement system...He prefers the one dimensional Mhz system to the multidimensional Quantispeed system...I don't...So be it...Let's move on!!!