SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: hlpinout who wrote (95826)3/8/2002 6:48:29 AM
From: hlpinout  Respond to of 97611
 
March 08, 2002 03:15

San Jose Mercury News, Calif., Wiretap Column
By Peter Delevett, San Jose Mercury News, Calif.
Mar. 8--Believe it or not, there's a wrinkle in the valley's biggest corporate soap opera -- the proposed merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq Computer -- that hasn't been beaten to death by the media.

Valley lawyers are chattering about the tens of millions of dollars HP and renegade board member Walter Hewlett are spending on legal fees. And they're placing bets about what happens to the losing side.

HP, in its corner, boasts the Rolls-Royce of valley tech-law firms, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. Hewlett, who's hoping to block HP's marriage to Compaq, has as his consigliere Palo Alto's Cooley Godward.

Neither one of these firms comes cheap, nor does Wilson Sonsini maestro Larry Sonsini. Sonsini confirms a report in the Wall Street Journal this week that he's personally spending four to six hours a day on HP.

"It is a very large and significant transaction, as you know, and the proxy contest has its own life and issues," Sonsini says.

According to the head of another elite tech-law firm, and to a former Wilson Sonsini insider, Sonsini commands around $650 an hour. That means HP could be paying one man a cool $3,250 a day -- more than $16,000 a week, assuming Sonsini takes the weekends off.

Rumor in the valley legal community has it that HP represents 10 percent of Wilson Sonsini's business, though Sonsini, the firm's chairman and chief executive, denies that.

"You know we have a very large and diversified practice," Sonsini admonishes, while declining to go into details of how much he's taking home or whether he's worried his firm could suffer if Hewlett wins.

That probably became less likely this week when a major domino, stockholder advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services, fell in HP's favor. But if Hewlett does pull off his boardroom coup, Wilson Sonsini is likely to meet the fate of a Romanov backer at the hands of the Bolsheviks.

"If the deal gets voted down and there's any change in leadership, Wilson has to go. That's the first thing I would do," says one of Sonsini's former partners.

Sitting pretty in that scenario would be Cooley Godward, though CEO Steve Neal dismisses that theory. "I've had no discussions or thoughts on that," he claims. "We were retained for one thing, and that's to advise Walter" and the William R. Hewlett Trust.

Neal, for his part, is said by someone close to him to be spending between 5 and 12 hours a day on the HP battle royale, though he'll concede only that he's "putting in a significant amount of time." (Of course, that's just what his other clients would expect him to say.)

Neal also won't bite when asked how much he bills per hour, though another former Wilson Sonsini partner says nobody in the valley is on a par with Sonsini.

"If Larry Sonsini isn't at the top end of what somebody would charge in Silicon Valley, who is?" this lawyer asks. "He's the most famous, the most accomplished and certainly, for something like this, the most experienced by far."

An experienced senior partner at most other firms can expect to bill between $300 and $400 an hour, the lawyer adds.

Unlike other lawyers I spoke to, this person doubts claims that HP represents 10 percent of Wilson Sonsini's business. Typically, he says, no single client ever contributes even as much as 5 percent of the firm's billings, a rule of thumb other local firms likewise adhere to.

According to a January report on Law.com, Wilson took in $425 million in revenue last year, making it the valley's fourth-highest grossing firm. (In case you're wondering, Morrison & Foerster was at the top of the heap with just under $500 million in revenues; Cooley Godward placed sixth at around $355 million.)

Even if the 10 percent theory is off-base, the many legal niceties of the HP transaction are surely keeping plenty of Wilson staffers busy. Especially with the market for other legal services, like advising on initial public offerings, dry as a bone.

Lawyers salivating on the sidelines say the proxy fight and other merger-related costs could spin off tens of millions of dollars in billings, though one of Sonsini's former partners says in such a major transaction, it's not unusual for a firm to negotiate some kind of set fee rather than just letting the meter run. HP has in-house counsel as well, which cuts back somewhat on its fees to Wilson Sonsini. (The company declined to discuss its merger-related legal costs.)

Walter Hewlett can't match the company's resources: as Neal puts it, "There's no question that if the outcome here depended purely on who could blow through the most cash, we'd lose. Management's got the entire corporate coffers."

On the flip side, even if Hewlett loses, Cooley Godward will be licking its wounds all the way to the bank.

--Contact Peter Delevett at pdelevett@sjmercury.com or (408) 271-3638.

-----

To see more of the San Jose Mercury News, or to subscribe to the newspaper, go to bayarea.com



To: hlpinout who wrote (95826)3/8/2002 7:24:50 AM
From: hlpinout  Respond to of 97611
 
Fiorina: Execution key to merger success

By Dawn Kawamoto
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
March 7, 2002, 1:45 PM PT

Hewlett-Packard will hit the ground running should its mega-merger with Compaq Computer win investor support this month, HP CEO Carly Fiorina said in a wide-ranging interview with CNET News.com on Thursday.
Speaking from the company's headquarters in Palo Alto, Calif., Fiorina touched on such topics as executing on the $22 billion merger and the timing of the tech industry's economic recovery. She also noted that HP has already completed a three-year product plan that it will share with customers on April 1, assuming shareholders approve the merger.

"The biggest risk of the merger is not strategy, but execution," Fiorina said. "But in the last six months, we have executed (on our financials), and that should give our investors some comfort."



On Feb. 13, HP reported pro forma earnings of 29 cents per share, slightly better than analyst expectations of 25 cents. The company attributed the results to strong sales of consumer products.

The good news was a departure from previous quarters: In the fourth quarter of 2000, HP missed earnings estimates. It went on to issue warnings during the first three quarters of 2001.

"We mis-executed in the fourth quarter of 2000, and I took responsibility for that," Fiorina said Thursday. "But in 2001, we performed quite well against other companies in our industry...and were one of the few profitable companies each quarter--and with lower accounts receivable and inventory."

Fiorina said that to improve its chances of executing post-merger, HP has completed a three-year plan for all its products. She said if the merger is approved, the company will share details of the plan within days of the shareholder vote.

She declined to elaborate on all of the plans, but said HP's crown jewel, its printing and imaging business, will definitely remain in the mix--despite calls by dissident board member Walter Hewlett to consider spinning off the lucrative business as a way to unlock shareholder value.


Complete radio interview (40 min.)
On her role: HP "needed to change"

On products: Expect "bundles" of consumer tech

On morale: "Need to put this fight behind us"



Fiorina said that though the HP board had earlier considered such a step, no plans along that line are being considered. The board was unanimous in its earlier decision to forego spinning off the operation, she noted.

"It makes no sense," she said, "because...digital imaging and publishing require using PCs, servers and storage"--other parts of HP's business.

HP and Compaq announced their merger plans last September, but the proposed marriage has received a lukewarm response on Wall Street and has been bitterly opposed by Hewlett, who complains that HP's lucrative printing business will be diluted by Compaq's low-margin PC business.

Among the other issues that Hewlett has raised in the proxy battle is that Fiorina and Compaq CEO Michael Capellas at one point stood to make a combined windfall of $115 million in the event of a successful deal. Hewlett has argued that any executive compensation package should be disclosed to shareholders before the vote.

But Fiorina affirmed Thursday that the compensation terms were not formally approved and that a new, combined board will take up the issue. Fiorina also noted that she will have to hit performance targets much higher than previously disclosed to receive her bonus.

And what are Fiorina's personal plans should the merger fail a shareholder vote? "I refuse to speculate on it because it's not useful," she said.

On macroeconomic issues, Fiorina said that a recovery for the tech industry may lag behind the overall economy.

Economic forecasters, such as Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan, have recently said the economy appears to be pulling out of a recession, but Fiorina expects the technology industry will not experience any growth in IT spending until the second half of this year.

"CEOs are quite cautious," she said. "In my view, the IT budgets may lag the economic recovery...In the late 1990s and early 2000, people spent a lot of money in a hurry" on IT, Fiorina said. "The big project for a lot of our customers is finding ways to consolidate their servers."