Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SBHX who wrote (81474)	3/8/2002 8:50:58 AM
From: capt rocky 1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

ok shorts, you will get another chance to jump in short this am on the pop. do you have the guts ? go ahead ,make your day! dirty rocky

To: SBHX who wrote (81474)	3/8/2002 11:13:55 AM
From: John F. Dowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

SBH: I think the "disruptive break throughs" that you cite are not more than engineering stop gap measures - not new science. Your comments on latency and spread sheet concerns seem to be areas that RMBS should address. I hope they are working on this unless it is a downside feature that is imbedded in the technology. I think INTC is against the tech because they messed up their RMBS chip set and embarrassed themselves. This might be more difficult to overcome than real scientific concerns. Also I believe INTC doesn't want to have RMBS tail wagging INTC Alpha Dog. JFD