Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Micro Devices - Moderated (AMD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SilentZ who wrote (74046)	3/8/2002 12:51:29 PM
From: TGPTNDR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 275872

-Z Re: <Reread the quote... how does that indicate in the least that he works for Intel?> (S)he's talking about getting roasted about his/her employer. The only employer (s)he got roasted about was Intel. The only reason (s)he got roasted about intel was because (s)he wouldn't admit to working for Intel -- and wouldn't say (s)he didn't work for intel either. The only thing (s)he would say was (s)he wasn't a paid Intel flack, but (s)he was doing the defining of what (s)he considered a flack to be. When I was working full time on the internet, my employer's position was simple. "We catch you posting on our time or from our site we'll fire you if we feel like it. We catch you posting something derogatory about the company you're fired. We catch you posting proprietary information you're fired. We don't care if it's on our time or yours, you're history". Watson's position (actually, my take on Watson's position) was that Wanna was posting on his/her employers time and was thus being paid for posting. Wanna could have denied it but didn't that I saw. You're saying (s)he's talking about an employer (s)he didn't get roasted about? LOL. You've got a viewpoint far removed from mine. That's one of my three Off Topic Posts for the day. tgptndr