SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (1862)3/8/2002 9:43:18 PM
From: Michael M  Respond to of 21057
 
Whatever flaws scientists have, they pale beside those of government. Maybe we could turn the problem over to the Senate Judicial Committee for hearings - that way we would be assured of a completely objective treatment of the subject.

BTW, when I use the term scientist, I am not referring to someone educated in the sciences who is active in promoting a point of view. I am referring to people who use the scientific method to investigate and report their findings for peer review.

I don't object to study of climate change and its possible effects. I do object to the hysteria that's been whipped up on this subject.

M



To: E who wrote (1862)3/8/2002 11:14:49 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
Do you disagree?:
Yes. This has been a political football long enough. Some of the promoters of global warming have even admitted they are pushing the theory for political reasons.

Like "wealth equalization" AKA "We don't look so bad if we make the rich countries poorer."

And the Kyoto Treaty is a bad joke. I figure we go to war before we accept that.

Let's get the science right, then call in the politicos- -if necessary.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News