I hope you don't mind if I take the opportunity to respond to your recent spate of psychotic ejaculations.
I'm particularly interested in your statement, When you have no argument against the truth, it is best not to respond! It is the first opinion I have ever seen from you that I tend to agree with, at least in your case.
Since you are clinically insane and completely wrong, you may not be able to follow the logic of the argument I am about to pose to you, but that's OK, all the regular ordinary people will understand, and that's what really counts.
Let's use this definition:
truth: that which is considered to be the supreme reality and to have the ultimate meaning and value of existence.
First, let's define our terms for everyone that's reading this. "Considered" means 'to think about carefully, to take into account, or to form an opinion about'. "Reality" means 'the quality or state of being actual, or that which exists objectively and in fact'.
Therefore I propose to you that 'truth', by definition, must be objective and factual. In other words, people must agree that something, a group of data, an observation, a conclusion, etc. exists objectively in order for that something to be "true"; while at the same time, said agreement may form a "truth" that, if not agreed upon by some other people, may not be "truth" to those others.
Let me give you a specific example from your own writing.
On your profile, you say, Jesus is the light of the world. He who follows Him will not walk in darkness but will have the light of life.
This is truth for you. However, it may not be truth, using our definition above, for a large group of human beings on this planet. Understand that I am not personally agreeing with your assertion or not agreeing, I am simply making a logical argument here.
Your response, I am sure, would be that the other people who don't see your truth, what you would call the "real truth" is not available to them, therefore they are misguided, misinformed, uniformed, or in some other way mentally flawed. Although you don't say it in your profile, it is clear from what you write that you have taken your truth one step farther. Anyone who has not accepted Jesus Christ as his personal Lord and Saviour is not only doomed, they are inherently evil and must be destroyed in order that you may survive.
Argue all you want, you mutant piece of shit, you can't deny it. You want everyone that is not a Christian to either become one right away or die. In fact, it would not surprise me at all if you are currently prepared to help any of these heathen bastards on their way to hell yourself personally, given the chance. Am I right? To put it in a form of factual empirical evidence; when David Duke was trying to be the President of the United States, [like he had a chance] you worked for him. You even had newspaper interviews when you yourself were running for public office where your political agenda was basically "Too Many Blacks In City Hall".
Let's be totally frank and honest just this one time, shall we? It's easy to see from your pus filled rants that you want all Jews to die, preferably today or early tomorrow at the latest. You can do your "My wife is Jewish" crap all you want, anyone that has an ounce of brain power can see what you are shooting for. Your wife is not Jewish, your wife is your pet. The chance of her disagreeing with you is nil. Not only that, you want all the people who don't agree with your truth to either start agreeing with it right this minute, or die. In Louisiana, how far is it from "Too Many Blacks in City Hall" to "Lynch the nigger bastard!"? Which brings up an obvious question, have you murdered anyone yourself maybe and gotten away with it? Ever watched one swinging from a tree back in the bayou behind your shack and smiled about a job well done, you scumball?
Sorry, I digress.
For you, there is some sort of closet Christian in every human being just waiting to come out. Nothing wrong with that. It's similar to a good cop and some criminal. The cop, if he is a good cop, may see that the criminal is simply misguided somehow and has the chance for redemption. The part you have failed to understand is that I can plug in the word "Muslim" or "Jew" or "Moonie" into that sentence and it makes the same sense, it just depends on the population you are talking about.
But you have taken it one step further. Not only are you personally in possession of ultimate truth, not only are you the vehicle for the word of the Almighty, but your manifesto includes a provision for human beings that are told your "truth" and then thereafter refuse to agree to it. For them, the only answer is death. They are not really human beings, because they cannot see the truth, therefore it is OK to take them to room temperature. Just like a really sick kitten. Or a nigger! You will never put that in print on this site, but any logical person can very easily deduce your motives. It's not complex.
You claim you are a scholar. You can't even spell, you jackass. Have you ever wondered what happens when somebody reads something that they don't understand and think they do? If you can't spell, then you can't possibly understand what you are reading, therefore you cannot possibly form valid conclusions except by the merest accident. People who are semi-literate and then believe lies or misunderstandings they have personally concluded based on data they have either not understood or misinterpreted, and then refuse to reconsider when their errors are pointed out are insane. You get that? Insane.
So logically, empirically, from what you type and spew, what is the difference between your arguments and those of the piece of shit that piloted that plane into the World Trade Center or his "spiritual leader"? There is only one difference, Emile, he was fighting for Allah, and you are fighting for Jesus. Otherwise, you two mutant cockroaches have the same mommy. And trust me on this, it ain't God or Allah. You, sir, are crazy. Despite being a Christian, which obviously is no antidote.
Now I will lay the real deal on you. Not because I think you will understand, because I know you are too insane to think coherently, but because the regular non-crazy people that read your vomit sometimes become slightly confused by what you post.
People on this earth have a spiritual essence. It's been recognized by great religions for thousands of years before Jesus Christ made his appearance. Some religions claim that the spiritual essence of a person is immortal. Some claim that the spiritual essence is actually basically evil and must be cleansed in some way for that person to achieve harmony with God. There are hundreds of religions, and dozens of major ones on this planet. They disagree on many, many things, mostly dogma. The one single thing that they all agree on is that man has some sort of spiritual essence. I am talking about what you call a "soul".
This is something that you and I agree on, I believe.
If it is "truth" that a man has a spiritual essence, and has since he appeared on this planet, then that spiritual essence can by definition be defined outside the realm of religious dogma. To put it simply for your mutated misguided insane mind, let's just say that a soul has no color and no dogma attached by definition, and it has existed prior to 2,000 years ago.
Assuming that, which is not a problem logically if one accepts the basic premise that we have agreed on here and made it "truth", then we can draw a conclusion. It may or may not be true for you, but we can still draw it. It is simply that the spiritual essence of man may be linked to a pursuit of its understanding. In other words, it might be possible that a prophet of God was interpreting his own spiritual essence when he wrote or said whatever he wrote or said, regardless of his name or when he was "alive".
Your assumption is that Jesus Christ was right, and all the other prophets of God were wrong. You have formed this conclusion to explain your own failure at understanding the spiritual essence of man. Your failure is due to your personal inability to comprehend the written word, coupled with some sort of compulsion for revenge against the "enemy" you have invented so you don't conclude that you yourself are the enemy. Once again, to put it in words you can understand, you can't face the fact that you are effed up totally, so you need to assert that somebody else is effed up, and that makes you OK.
There are Moslems like you, Jews like you, probably Buddhists like you, who knows. But you all have the same problem. You want anyone who won't buy into your psychosis to die. Either they agree with you or they die.
Therefore, I submit that what you type, and what you believe, and what you think, is not only un-Christian, it is in fact evil.
You have this chance to wise up and apologize for all the mean, nasty, evil shit you have typed on this site. Not taking it right this minute is logical empirical proof that you are a useless and unnecessary weight on the entire population of this planet.
That's the real truth, chump. Deal with it.
P.S. You guessed about two years ago that I was Jewish, and were shocked to learn I am Christian.
Guess what color my skin is. Guess what color my soul is.
Oh, and by the way, **** you and your whole damned posse. |
