Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Richnorth who wrote (83125)	3/10/2002 2:21:48 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

user.dccnet.com Except for some of the dates this article which appeared in the Montreal Gazette begins to have some of its facts straight. What was publicized widely about the bomb has to be hooey. The more they repeat it, the more you know it's hooey. Why would they want one person to know the real facts? It was only the most secret operation in military history. Why lie about it? The info about the ZEEP reactor is basically correct except for the date. The date should read 1943 not 1945. Slight errror. In 1943 the Chalk River Reactor was supplying electricity for the town of Rolphton Ontario. That is slightly more advanced than the dedication plaque points to. Slight error number two. So who told me about these zany facts? 1. a resident of Rolphton Ontario during the war. 2. The procurement officer for the Chalk River Nuclear Reactor. 3. My father, who operated the Chalk River Nuclear Reactor in 1954. 4. Gilbert Labine, a friend of my father's, in 1955. 5. A women scientist who worked on the bomb when she graduated U of T in 1939. She described to me in 1962, how she saw the first person to die in nuclear experimentation when he slipped with a screwdriver holding two spheres of uranium apart behind a Niobium shield. That was in Canada at Chalk River, or Rolphton as the town is known. She was in the room at the time. 6. my father's 4th year engineering exams at Malvern, in 1934 which asked a question about how much enriched uranium it would take to form a runaway chain reaction based on known decay rates. If they all lied, it just goes to show you that you can't trust those cockeyed eyewitneses, but you can believe what you read in the newspapers. EC<:-}

To: Richnorth who wrote (83125)	3/10/2002 6:31:50 AM
From: Square_Dealings	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116759

That report is going to go over REAL BIG in China and Russia. Bush is a kid playing army with his big toys. I think its the little man complex. THIS GUY IS DANGEROUS. Make peace not war. M.