Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LTK007 who wrote (39486)	3/10/2002 10:16:58 AM
From: dvdw©	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 99280

I find it interesting that so many posting here are projecting Context to bolster their particular arguments. By way of example Mr Buffett, he is talking about Berkshire in his letter to his shareholders, those extrapolating this to include areas outside his own ares of deliberation are simply implying context that is not intended. George cole gives us the Borus link where the disclaimer actually makes the best case in the world for discounting the message. If the authors themselves have to disclaim every word they write, then why write at all? We could go on but why ? Obfuscation is at the root of these posters message. One could reasonably ask, to whom is the obfuscation intended? To paint the world as perpetually unsafe is a fair thing to do, but to not follow the logical trajectory of the fates of these Al Queda recruits is also unfair. The momentum today is working on the replacement theory, where one guy dies and 50 step up to take their place. I am fully prepared to discount this argument for you, but wont do it here or now, I think it's best to leave the wall of worry intact, and even raise it a bit, because that is exactly what is deserved. ro/rs=cf All action happens against the float.