Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Selectric II who wrote (236074)	3/10/2002 11:08:27 PM
From: PROLIFE	Respond to of 769670

To her, yes. It is amazing that to her kind, a normal pregnancy, is "forced gestation" I can see her leer and spit when she says that...just another buzzword, sort of like "choice".

To: Selectric II who wrote (236074)	3/11/2002 12:40:21 AM
From: E	Respond to of 769670

No, it's what happens when, for example a miserable(impoverished) woman with six children she already can't take care of, who desperately wants an abortion, has a choice between a knitting needle, a backally abortion, or having the fertilized ovum remain and grow inside her because the police might come if she removes it when her period is late. I put 'impoverished' in parentheses because all middle class and rich women including the wives and girlfriends and daughters of the anti-choice politicians will have safe abortions, as they always have. The rich will get richer and abortions, the poor will get poorer and more unwanted children who will themselves have more unwanted children! It's exponential! Good thinking. A variation on an old saying.