Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (45523)	3/10/2002 10:44:22 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 82486

Actually E, I think you do have quite the agenda. that is my personal "opinion". If you didn't, I don't think you would be hammering this whole thing to death. As usual, your perceptions are spot on.

To: epicure who wrote (45523)	3/11/2002 12:08:21 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I post, you post, others post. I'm not posting two to one on the issue, I point out. The ways you call people, here me, names is without nouns, congratulating yourself sanctimoniously for, what is it, "commenting" on what you call their "behavior." Your comments are things like "I think you do have quite the agenda." If anyone here doesn't see the implied name in that, I'll explicate. Does anyone not know that "quite the agenda" is not the same as, said about herself, "I too have an agenda." Do you have "quite the agenda," X? How about how I am "trying to manufacture facts"? Trying to. For a nefarious reason of some sort I'm still not clear on. Oh, is it because of the mediator suggestion? Anyone who doesn't perceive the noun-name X called me while pretending a lofty nounless niceness-status raise their hand. Better yet, read back in the thread. This is getting repetitive. . I think you think it is nasty of me to even think that you made up what you made up. And quite frankly I don't understand that. I think it is nasty of you to turn an error regarding the SI-friends status of you in relation to CH into an accusation that I am a nounless liar. I think it is nasty of you not to apologize when you realized that, in fit of pique, you said something rude and indefensible, so to go through this silliness pretending that it was just "an opinion," and you don't, heaven forfend, "call people names." I think it is nasty of you to keep calling an error "making something up" (with a covert nefarious agenda. Quite a one!) You aren't so very different on SI than you were when you were announcing how much pleasure you got out of being mean here. You just use language self defensively, is my impression and observation of your behavior, and without nouns. That's just my opinion and impression. I think if you were any nicer a person, I would notice a change. But I could be wrong, of course.