Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rollcast... who wrote (21207)	3/12/2002 11:10:03 AM
From: Win Smith	Respond to of 281500

You wrote, along with other random spewage: An example of rational thought (since it is obvious you require a few) might be that mutually assured destruction does not result in the destroyed parties being served by the other (along with 72 virgins) in the afterlife. #reply-17183874 I wrote: "Rational thought" does, of course, require demonizing anybody not in line with current pronouncements from the Wolfowitz/Perle crowd. We must not let any dissent get in the way of the desired path to WWIII. #reply-17184032 You wrote: Fortunately, just as with the media bias question, all the facts line up with the Saddam demonization. #reply-17184374 I wrote: A lot broader part of the world than Saddam gets routinely demonized around here. #reply-17184715 You wrote: Predictably, you attempted to change the subject. #reply-17184910 So, I guess I'm "predictably" attempting to change the subject from Saddam demonization, which, somewhere in there, you decided was "the subject". Or maybe "the subject" was supposed to be "leftist media bias", another amusing topic given the relative prominence of, say, the "fairandballanced" commentary produced by Rush, Drudge, Roger Ailes' Fox News operation, and the WSJ editorial page, versus "Moore/Chomsky", whoever Moore is. Whatever.