SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: foundation who wrote (20254)3/12/2002 1:52:12 PM
From: JohnG  Respond to of 196654
 
Brn. Thanks!



To: foundation who wrote (20254)3/12/2002 2:09:39 PM
From: Eric L  Respond to of 196654
 
re: cdma2000 Release A

Sync channel Ad Hoc recommendation is:

3. Agreed solution for Sync Channel issue

The Ad Hoc agreed to recommend to TSG-C the text for both the core changes and the traffic to idle approved by the WG2 at the November 2001 meeting as the solution for Sync channel issue. TSG-C is also invited to consider the solution addressed by the contribution by LGE.


I believe I am correct in stating that what is being referred to is the standards based solution proposed by Qualcomm in SC-SCAH-20020227-004B (and developed by TSG-C Working Group 2, C00-200101050-50A) as its recommendation for solving the sync channel issue. That is essentially what Motorola, Nokia, Nortel just proposed.

The Koreans have about run out of steam attempting to stymie this one, and may in fact (probably will) vote in favor of adoption of that recommendation.

Release A was in fact released for publication but it essentially goes nowhere till sync channel is resolved either as a standards based solution or a non-standard work around. If standards based, estimate is 60 to 90 days to fully mature the specification.

I also think there may have been a vote on this in TSG today, which in Kobe was almost yesterday.

- Eric -