Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (236954)	3/12/2002 6:54:01 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

"Quit attacking me and address the issues" To me the primary issue revolves around truth and integrity. From what I have seen you post, you have attacked the President and Vice President (and the Presidents father) based on your dislike for them, in conjunction with an assertion that cheating on a government study for political purposes is no big deal (as long as it is against the "rapers and pillagers" iyo). I believe that is the issue, and that is why I chose to post. I apologize for linking you to the democrats, but because this tactic is so prevelent in their methods, I incorrectly linked you to them. Is it fair to say liberal instead of democrat? If both parties debated the issues on their merits and formed their positions based on the results of those debates our country would be in much better shape. Unfortunatley (imo) there are too many who are loose with the facts, and support criminal behavior for their friends and make up criminal behavior for their enemies. I like to point that out when I see it (as I have in your posts), so others can judge the content. And I really don't care if you put me on ignore. I have written honestly on how I percieve your posts, and if I have been wrong you should point out where. When America or those that I support are attacked and no back-up is offered (other than with references to Molly Ivin's opinion) I will attack back so to speak. If there is back-up to support it, then the topic can be argued on the merits. If real wrongdoing was involved, we would be on the same side. I hate corruption, cheating and dishonesty in general. Your position seems to be that dishonesty is ok when it will benefit your political positions. That's what it looks like to me anyway.