Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Complacency Indexes -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bob wallace who wrote (706)	3/12/2002 7:12:24 PM
From: TechTrader42	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1487

You'll be unsubscribed with such astute observations on an otherwise useless thread, Bob. They seem out of place. Are you sure you didn't mean to post to another thread? This thread is for Skeptical Analysis of Botched Commodities Trades. (Isn't there a magazine with a similar name?) Anyway, to get back to your note. It's certainly possible, I must admit, even if the "aggressive names" remain undisclosed (so that whatever moves up can be labeled the aggressive names in hindsight). If there is a rally, though, our negated signals will kick in, and we'll still be infallible, so not to worry. We'll revise our predictions if that doesn't work. ("I actually said, "Buy!" I just happen to spell it as "Sell!") Supporting the CI's case that the momentum in the uptrend might (with an emphasis on might) wind down are the McClellan oscillator daily charts, for both the advance/declines and the advance/decline volume ($VOLD). ESignal makes these easy to see with the new McClellan indicators in the beta. Footnote: Might isn't always right.