SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (2398)3/13/2002 3:30:29 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 21057
 
That's a very good explanation of your reasoning.

I would however separate moral and religious from moral/religious. You can certainly have moral ideas or use language involving morals without bringing God in to it.

Tim



To: Lane3 who wrote (2398)3/14/2002 2:15:58 AM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 21057
 
You're right. "Evil" is not a term that can or should be applied to non-living things.

But that's not what were talking about here. You said Hitler and Stalin were evil. Were they just "components", part of an engineering design?

Individual Americans can frame this any way they want to.
Individual Americans can and should influence how the government perceives matters.

WWI was the war to make the world safe for democracy? Is that not a moral stance?

WWII took on aspects of a crusade after Pearl Harbor. After the war, Eisenhower wrote a book called "Crusade In Europe". No moral overtones there.

Governments often try to frame their wars in moral tones. Nothing new here. Lincoln didn't particularly care whether the Civil War freed a single slave. He said so. It was hard to get people riled up about "free navigation of the Mississippi", though. He changed it into a crusade to end slavery. That had good effects and bad effects (like days of riots in NYC).

And those 19 nhijackers aboard those 4 jets? What do you call them? The Good Guys?