Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (162076)	3/13/2002 4:59:31 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Ten re: Last time I checked, Fab 25 was making nothing but processors for that entire year. check again, it was never 100% cpu to begin with :-)) Regards -Albert

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (162076)	3/13/2002 5:04:27 PM
From: dale_laroy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

>You are deluding yourself if you think AMD can maintain 20% market share without Fab 25.< My guess is that Fab30 could potentially produce 5 million Palomino processors per quarter, if it were fully ramped at 180nm. Optimistically, the transition to 130nm should increase this to 9 million Thoroughbred processors per quarter. Of course, the transition to Barton would decrease yields, but then again Appaloosa would account for roughly half of Fab30's production. I think that AMD could potentially ship 9 million processors per quarter from Fab30 at full ramp of 130nm.