SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (162135)3/14/2002 12:11:25 AM
From: dale_laroy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
If you ask me, that is a phenomenal yield!

>Since that time, MAD has taken 2 1/2 years to ramp to full production by the end of 2001, and were only able to produce 4 million CPUs on 4000 to 5000 wafer starts/quarter during that last quarter of 2001.<

4 million CPUs on 4000 to 5000 wafer starts would be between 800 and 1000 CPUs per wafer, which is extraordinary yield for only 200 candidate CPUs per wafer.

Perhaps you meant 4000 to 5000 wafer starts/week, which would be on the order of 62 to 77 CPUs per wafer.

Of course, I'm not sure it is fair to assume AMD is able to actually achieve 100% up time on their equipment.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (162135)3/14/2002 10:51:29 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Paul, >And now, the 0.13 micron process is a full year BEHIND Intel's 0.13 micron process - and Intel had to add 6 layers of Copper to their process whereas MAD already "supposedly" had the copper process in place at the 0.18 micron node.

Yep - MAD is struggling with their process development and integration and production.


OK, I'll be the straight man. You figure 0.13 SOI to be very problematic for AMD as well?

Tony