SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (21365)3/14/2002 12:44:29 PM
From: Rollcast...  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
As Europe fades away, USA will be alone
(of course this was written by Pat Buchanan...)

U.S. foreign policy is "absolutist and simplistic." America has gone into "unilateralist overdrive," thunders Chris Patten of the European Union, a Briton and a friend.
Patten echoes the British, French and German foreign ministers, the last of whom, Joschka Fischer, rails that "a world with 6 billion people will not be led into a peaceful future by the mightiest power alone."

Shocked by the "axis of evil" speech, enraged over the green light President Bush flashed Ariel Sharon to crush the Palestinian intifada, terrified that a U.S. war on Iraq could detonate the entire Middle East, Europe has begun to challenge the United States openly — condemning U.S. treatment of the Taliban and al-Qaeda prisoners in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, ignoring U.S. sanctions on Iraq and Iran and calling for a Palestinian state.

Has Europe just come down with a case of the "vapors," as Secretary of State Colin Powell suggests?

No, there is more, much more, to this clash than the usual outbreak of bed-wetting whenever the Yanks go for their gunships. Europe wants out of America's imperial wars, because Europe, cockpit of history for five centuries, is finished. Europe is dying. Kiss the Mother Continent goodbye — and along with it the salad days of the American-European alliance.

In researching my new book, I could not find a single European nation, save Muslim Albania, with a birth rate to enable it to survive in its present form through mid-century. The United Nations projects Europe will lose 124 million people by 2050, equivalent to the entire population of Belgium, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Germany.

In 1950, peoples of European stock were nearly 30% of the world's population and in the midst of the greatest baby boom in their history. By 2050, they will be down to just over 10%. One in three Europeans will be over 60, and one in 10 over 80. Some European nations already report more burials than births. Not since the Black Plague has Europe seen a population collapse like this.

Meanwhile, the Third World will add between 3 billion and 4 billion people by 2050 — the equivalent of 30 to 40 new Mexicos.

As the nations of Europe age, they have three choices if they wish to maintain their generous pension and health-care systems for the elderly:

Raise retirement ages and slash health and pension benefits.
Double or triple taxes on their shrinking number of workers.
Import hundreds of millions from the Third World.
Just to maintain the current 4.8-to-1 ratio of working-age population (ages 15-64) to seniors (65 and above), Europe must import 1.4 billion people by 2050.

Where will they come from? North Africa, the Middle East and the ex-colonies of the old empires. And the consequences for a continent that has never experienced mass immigration are at hand. Last summer, race riots erupted in the British Midland towns of Bradford, Burnley, Oldham and Leeds. In Paris, Algerian toughs stormed a soccer field during a game with France, chanting Osama bin Laden's name as terrified Parisians locked themselves in skyboxes. Moroccan youth are returning to the Spanish towns from which their Moorish ancestors were expelled in 1492. Islam has begun to reconquer Europe.

If you would see the future, look to Italy. When Rome recently advanced a law to expel 300,000 illegal aliens, an amendment was added to allow nannies and caretakers for the elderly to stay. The United Nations estimates that Italy will need 235,000 immigrants every year just to maintain its population stability. By 2050, Italy's median age will be 54, some 13 years older than the nation with the oldest median age today, Japan. Meanwhile, Italy fends off regular boatloads of Muslim aliens.

With 12 million to 15 million Muslims in Europe, Islam has surpassed Judaism as Europe's second religion — and is its most vibrant, for as the Christian churches of Europe empty out, the mosques are filling up. There are more than 2,000 mosques in Germany and 5 million Muslims in France. In the first year of the 21st century — an Islamic Century? — an estimated half-million illegal immigrants entered Europe.

Europe's Muslims now act as a powerful disincentive to Europe's involvement in any war against Islamic nations, just as the Irish served as an impediment to any rapprochement between Britain and America from the 1850s to the eve of World War I.

In the 1860s, the Fenian Brotherhood tried to incite war between the USA and Great Britain with repeated raids into Canada. In 1888, a letter praising President Grover Cleveland, written by the British ambassador in Washington, cost the envoy his post and helped to cost Cleveland the presidency. In 1896, Republicans advanced William McKinley's election prospects by issuing a pamphlet titled, How McKinley is Hated in England.

Europe — wholly dependent on Arab and Gulf oil, fearful of terrorism from the al-Qaeda cells being unearthed across the continent, aware that Muslim resistance and possibly riots will erupt if it joins a U.S. war on Arab or Islamic nations, its own population aging and vanishing — can never again be relied on to help fight U.S. wars in the Middle East, the Persian Gulf or Central Asia.

The birth rate of America's native born is also below replacement levels, but an estimated 1.5 million legal and illegal immigrants yearly, and their children, keep the U.S. numbers steadily rising.

We are on our own. If America intends war against Bush's "axis of evil," do not expect French, British or German troops marching up to Baghdad beside us, or standing with us as we confront Tehran. The halcyon days of the Great Alliance are over. Any U.S. war in the arc of crisis from the Middle East to Central Asia will be fought without NATO.

Europe is done. Her crusades are history, her empires gone, her glory and greatness behind her. Europe wants to enjoy her golden years in peace and quiet consumption, as she slowly passes away.

Best we leave her alone with her memories and her scrapbooks. Ave atque vale, Europa. Hail and farewell, Europe.

usatoday.com



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (21365)3/14/2002 1:21:34 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
From the Washington Post's media watch, on lack of balance in Mideast Reporting (This is something, but it covers American media only).

This lack of balance has two main factors: a) the huge moral double standard Israel labors under. The Jews gave morality to the western world, so everyone one expects Israel to set a shining moral example of how to fight terrorism without getting your hands dirty, and b) censorship, both self- and imposed. If you report nasty things about the IDF, no one will threaten or shoot you. This is definitely NOT the case if you report nasty things about the PLO from Ramallah. The PA intimidates reporters and censors news regularly. So the news from PA territory tends to concentrate on Israeli misdeeds. That's why it's so common to see pictures of Israeli soldiers and tanks and so rare to see pictures of Palestinian gunmen.

_________________________________________________________

Sense of Balance Tough to Find in Mideast
By Howard Kurtz
Washington Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 14, 2002; 9:15 AM

If the Israelis have lost Geraldo, they may be losing the American public.

As 150 Israeli tanks rolled into the Palestinian town of Ramallah, the Fox News correspondent had some surprisingly harsh things to say about the Jewish state.

In terms of world diplomacy, President Bush's mild rebuke of Ariel Sharon's actions yesterday is vastly more important.

But as a barometer of media coverage, Rivera's comments, as self-involved as they were, may be worth examining.

Complaining about the constant assaults on the West Bank by tanks and F-16s, with inevitable civilian casualties, Geraldo declared: "That's not fighting terrorism. That is inflicting terrorism.

"I have been a Zionist my entire life. I would die for Israel. But watching the suffering of the Palestinian people, I'm also becoming a Palestinian-ist."

The problem, which all journalists face, is that focusing mainly on Israeli retaliation tends to leave out the horrible Palestinian provocations – the suicide bombers that have killed Israeli civilians – that prompted the response in the first place.

It would be like showing U.S. warplanes hitting Afghan towns without mentioning that there was this episode called Sept. 11.

Geraldo soon got carried away. "You can't round up Palestinian young men and put numbers on their arms to make it easier to identify them," he said. "That reminds the world, that reminds Jews, of what Hitler and the Nazi pigs inflicted on the Jewish race during the Second World War."

He paused for a split-second. "Maybe the comparison is not precise," he said.

Maybe.

But the Middle East has become a killing field, and keeping a sense of balance – in covering those who intentionally kill civilians (like al Qaeda) and those who do so as an unavoidable part of warfare – is important.

The New York Times has Bush ratcheting up the pressure:

"President Bush criticized Israel today, saying that a halt to bloodshed in the Middle East depends on a willingness to 'create conditions for peace' and asserting that Israel's actions of late have been counterproductive.

"'Frankly, it's not helpful, what Israel has recently done,' Mr. Bush said at an afternoon news conference. At another point, the president said he hoped that Prime Minister Ariel Sharon of Israel was concerned about the loss of 'innocent life' in the region. 'It breaks my heart,' Mr. Bush said.

"Scores of Arabs and Israelis have been killed in the past two weeks, as Israeli troops have swept through Palestinian enclaves in what Israel says is a hunt for terrorists and a self-defense operation against Palestinian suicide bombers.

"But Palestinians have been enraged as some Israeli bullets have killed civilians, as the homes of some Palestinians have been demolished and as roadblocks and personal searches by Israeli soldiers have become more frequent."

The Washington Post sees Cheney caught in the diplomatic crossfire: "Vice President Cheney, who is traveling through the Arab world seeking support for a confrontation with Iraq, was forced in Egypt to focus on the Middle East in response to Arab anger at Israel's largest offensive in the West Bank and Gaza Strip since they were occupied in 1967. . . .

"The vice president had anticipated that concerns about the Middle East conflict would arise at each of his 11 stops in the region, but the issue now consumes more time than he expected, according to a senior administration official. The escalating violence was the subject of extensive discussions with Jordan's King Abdullah on Monday and will figure prominently as Cheney heads to Arab Gulf countries later this week.

"The administration official said the attention being paid to the violence has not bumped any of Cheney's priorities from the agenda. The official, however, left little doubt that the timing of the Israeli escalation has not worked to Cheney's advantage.

"In a news conference with Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak in Sharm el-Sheikh, Cheney said, 'We plan to do everything we can to persuade both parties that it's time for violence to end, and I'll reiterate that position in every single stop along the way.' . . .

"Cheney, one of the administration's most ardent defenders of Israel, said, 'The burden is on both parties to bring an end to the violence. It's not going to be possible to make progress until both parties can agree to a cease-fire.'

washingtonpost.com