Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (162172)	3/14/2002 1:44:43 PM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony then again, what happened with this famous copper contamination that destroyed amd' .18 process? AMD is still hiding it and those athlons are just remarked pIIs..... :-))

To: Tony Viola who wrote (162172)	3/14/2002 2:01:28 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony, "AMD's track record and obvious inferiority to Intel in process and manufacturing engineering." Stop repeating common fallacies and lies. How many times have I point to obvious: On identical microarchitecture, 386 and 486 processors, AMD always has beaten Intel manufacturing by selling higher-speed-grade parts. On similar (pipe length-wise) architectures, K6 vs. P-MMX and K7 vs. P-III, the same happened. In the CPU market, the excellence in manufacturing was the only means for AMD surviving. Please stop repeating the lie about AMD manufacturing inferiority. - Ali