Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (237956)	3/14/2002 1:51:36 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

Thanks, Karnack. Now, can we do the envelope trick?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (237956)	3/14/2002 2:02:33 PM
From: Sedohr Nod	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Thus and therefore golden retrievers should take over airport security?....or does your logic not extend that far?

To: TigerPaw who wrote (237956)	3/14/2002 3:08:08 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Perhaps. But it looks to me, whenever I encounter a room full of well-trained gun-toting individuals, there is less chance anyone will attempt anything out of line. Accidents can happen, and bozos get a wide berth. I tend to give armed folks a wide berth anyway except in organized situations. An armed society is a polite society, as they say. I don't expect everyone to be competent or trustworthy to be armed. The untrustworthy ones either follow the rules or get ostracized. It reaaaallly makes you pay attention to someone, if they are armed and not quite right. Trust (i.e. safety) is relative. From what little I know about you, in peacetime I would probably trust you slightly more than the average NRA member. I would trust the average NRA member more than the government. I trust our government more than any other government ... which isn't saying squat, btw.