Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (25450)	3/14/2002 11:51:00 PM
From: golden_tee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Your are clearly misreading here. The statement "at a customary discount to market, in exchange for the amounts funded" is referring to Berg's "usual" arrangement with VLNC. You are way off base with the suggestion of a leaky floorless. This is simply not the case. Call them, don't irresponsibly make this claim! Might you be a wee bit short here... again?????? Zeev, Whatever you'd like people to believe, will you be here to apologize to this board when this issue has been clarified, and you are TOTALLY WRONG? Yes or no??

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (25450)	3/15/2002 7:31:54 AM
From: hcirteg	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

Zeev.... Please explain...if your "Berg shorting" theory is true, how Berg would allow a Board Director to load up on shares right before the announcment of the financing... IMO...it makes your floorless theory quite unlikely..or Berg a complete A-hole in the face of his board. I seriously doubt it.... HC

To: Zeev Hed who wrote (25450)	3/15/2002 8:23:25 AM
From: John Curtis	Respond to of 27311

Zeev: I understand what you're saying, but in this case you need to take Berg's historical relationship with VLNC into account. He's not Castle. He's not a hedge fund knocking and scheming at the door. The manner in which he's conducted himself in the past suggest one need not be overly concerned with hedge fund style action. 'Course....having said this I'll also have to admit that history is always 20/20 backwards vision. One can never be sure it'll hold true into the future. But even so, though I be bound to the sidelines, Berg's past actions suggest he'll not be pursuing hedgie styled tactics. Be that as it may the proof will only come with........time. Regards! John~