Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Mirant Corporation (MIR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (354)	3/15/2002 2:09:12 AM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 903

...can't truthfully dispute my debating points. Ha! You crack me up. Here are you "debating points:" They wouldn't happen to be friends of yours, would they? Mirant grandly prances in front of the FERC ... ...we've gotten screwed by Mirant's shenanigans ... ...these schemers wouldn't have been mentioned in that article ... First, they would lie about the involvement. Mirant is dirty on this one, and hoping to get dirtier. You may prefer lies to the truth. I don't. Andersen just indicted. Mirant's up next... Debating points, you say? I only see a mad rant, pretending to be debate and filled with about every logical fallacy in the book, including: affirming the consequent appeal to consequences argumentum ad ignorantiam argumentum ad hominem argumentum ad populum circular definition petitio principii prejudicial language untestability Try putting together a coherent, logical argument - perhaps even including a fact or two just for fun. Then we can have a debate.