SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Dave Gore's Trades That Make Sense -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dave Gore who wrote (3907)3/15/2002 2:19:32 AM
From: Dave Gore  Respond to of 16631
 
Microsoft PEG = 1.6, VRTS = 5.9? Should you care?

As odd as it sounds, most analysts and investors never really say much about PEG, even though almost everyone thinks it's a valid measurement of a stocks worth. In fact most traders have no idea what the PEG is of their favorite stocks.

Price-Earnings-Growth, which is usually defined as the PE Ratio divided by the average growth rate of a stock over a 5 year period (or its average expected 5 yr. growth rate) was created to help us more accurately calculate a fair market value of a security.

That is something that PE alone doesn't do very well. After all, a boring ol' cyclical stock with a PE of 10 that grows at 5% probably isn't worth as much as a high flying tech stock with a PE of 30 that has been growing at 60% per year for the last 3 years and is expected to grow at 30% per year for the next 5 years.

Like VIX and other indicators, PEG may only be as important as the attention it gets. But to me, it is crucial in letting me know just how good a deal a stock is at a specific price point.



To: Dave Gore who wrote (3907)3/15/2002 10:35:55 AM
From: rellabourn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 16631
 
Dave,

A search of Nasdaq stocks for PEG's<1 and trading volume>300k revealed 64 companies. Here are the top 15 based on my search:

AMAT
SANM
ALTR
NVLS
CMCSK
CMVT
GILD
TLAB
IDTI
MCDT
MUSE
TQNT
NITE
ARXX
SSCC