Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: long-gone who wrote (83303)	3/15/2002 8:36:17 AM
From: IngotWeTrust	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 117073

He's pullin' yer chain, Richard. Griffiths and Yorkton are A-N-Y-T-H-I-N-G *but* conservative. And Diamonds are about as off topic as EC can get, unless he wants to discuss syphillis s'more. HOWEVER, that being said, there ARE bugs under the diamond plays' rocks fer sure... afterall, goldbug numero UNO here, is in some Dialing Diamonds fer Dollars plays... Here's a fact fer yer file: These diamond pipes consider a diamond to be a macro-diamond at ONE MILLIMETER!!!! or greater...in otherwords, that's the cut-off grade for bulk sample testing. The more of the bitty babies, i.e., below 1mm, the more economically feasible it is to persue the development of a diamond mine to mine it. Any guesses as to why? And to keep this on topic, I'll also offer a "question B"... What is the favorite METAL for mounting "gonzo" macro diamonds in western culture (and why, price-wise<grin>)