SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : VOLTAIRE'S PORCH-MODERATED -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (48696)3/15/2002 2:17:26 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Andersen's Client Exodus Accelerates After Indictment

By DAVE CARPENTER
AP Business Writer
Friday March 15, 2:12 pm Eastern Time

CHICAGO (AP) -- Arthur Andersen LLP's weakening hold on its major corporate clients got shakier Friday in the wake of its criminal indictment, with three blue-chip companies firing the troubled auditor and others indicating they may do the same.

Sara Lee Corp., Northeast Utilities and Brunswick Corp. all severed decades-long relationships with Andersen as their auditor -- Sara Lee since 1965, Northeast Utilities since 1977 and Brunswick since 1942.

All three Fortune 500 corporations said the decision was made before Thursday's indictment of Andersen, with Sara Lee chairman and CEO C. Steven McMillan citing the fact that the company's viability as an audit firm was already "in great jeopardy."

But Abbott Laboratories Inc. specifically cited the indictment as cause for further concern. The North Chicago-based drug and medical products maker called a special meeting of its board of directors to review its 39-year auditing ties with Andersen, which it had endorsed publicly just three days earlier. It said it had been making contingency plans in case Andersen was indicted.

Sara Lee, a $5 billion consumer goods company, is the biggest of the companies to end ties with Andersen Friday. The Chicago firm said it had made no decision on a new auditor.

Northeast Utilities Systems, based in Berlin, Conn., picked Deloitte & Touche to replace Andersen. The New England energy supplier said it began looking to replace Andersen months ago, calling the decision extremely difficult because it had received "exemplary" auditing service from Andersen but was concerned about its future.

Brunswick Corp. hired Ernst & Young as its auditor. Spokesman Dan Kubera declined comment when asked about the role of the Enron controversy in his Lake Forest, Ill.-based company's decision to drop Andersen.

Andersen already had lost more than a half-dozen Fortune 500 clients this month. Petroleum refinery operator Valero Energy Corp. jointed that fast-growing list Thursday, disclosing in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that it had ousted Andersen and hired Ernst & Young in a decision made two days earlier.

A smaller firm, Minnesota-based Polaris Industries Inc., the world's largest snowmobile manufacturer, announced Friday that it, too, was dumping Andersen for Ernst & Young.

Andersen spokesmen did not immediately return telephone calls Friday seeking a reaction to the slew of client defections.

The moves follow defections earlier this month by Delta Air Lines, FedEx Corp., Freddie Mac, Household International, Merck & Co. and SunTrust Banks, and others in the past two weeks. More are considering doing so as they file proxy statements and hold annual meetings.

Others are almost certain to follow as corporations file annual proxies and hold annual meetings. Smithfield Foods acknowledged after Thursday's indictment that it was considering replacing Andersen, and Waste Management, American Home Products Corp. (AHP - news) and UAL Corp., parent of United Airlines, all said their relationship with Andersen is under review.

A federal grand jury indicted Andersen for shredding documents related to its auditing client Enron, which filed for bankruptcy in December.

"The indictment in itself does not mean guilty," said Arthur Bowman, editor of Atlanta-based Bowman's Accounting Report, an industry publication. "But in the client's mind, it's associated with guilt. And it's difficult to imagine a CEO or chairman standing before shareholders endorsing an indicted CPA firm as auditor."

While swapping auditors can be costly and inconvenient for major corporations, "the risk of staying with them is they may not be there to work for you in three months or six months," he said.

Andersen insisted Thursday there are no plans to file for bankruptcy protection, even though experts say that may be its best hope to stop the exodus of clients and employees and find a buyer.

Spokesman Charlie Leonard acknowledged, however, that the indictment means "a significant hit to the business."

Filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy would almost certainly signal the end of Andersen's 89 years as an independent company -- if Thursday's indictment by a federal grand jury didn't do so already, according to those who track the industry.

Bowman said industry observers still see a bankruptcy filing as an option, since that's the likeliest way to seal a deal with another member of the Big Five accounting firms. An acquisition by a major firm, he said, could happen as early as next week.

"Every one of them would like to get Andersen if the price is right, and the price has to include no extension of liability," he said.



To: Sully- who wrote (48696)3/16/2002 12:00:21 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 65232
 
Business Investment Shows Life

By Jonathan Nicholson
Saturday March 16, 8:56 am Eastern Time

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - When Federal Reserve Vice Chairman Roger Ferguson sat down at a table full of manufacturing executives recently, he may not have been too encouraged by the wary business sentiment.

According to Tom Duesterberg, president of the Manufacturers Alliance/MAPI of Arlington, Virginia, where the roundtable took place a few weeks ago, the consensus among the approximately two dozen executives there was that business had indeed improved from the downturn seen after the Sept. 11 attacks.

Still, worries about how strong it would be in the future still held sway, as few of the executives said they expected to invest in new equipment any time soon.

``It's trust, but verify,'' said Duesterberg, recalling former president Ronald Reagan's aphorism about the Soviet Union during the Cold War.

That, in a nutshell, is the dilemma the U.S. central bank faces as it reassesses the economic outlook.

With the U.S. economy apparently well on its way to recovering from the recession that started in March 2001, the business side of the economy remains tentative. Having an excess of capacity, firms are wary about adding any more or replacing older equipment with the latest and most advanced versions.

Already, business investment has declined for four straight quarters, the first time that has happened since the early 1990s. The long boom that began in 1991 was led, many economists say, by businesses' willingness to invest in new and better equipment that in turn made their workers more productive and boosted bottom lines.

A reluctance to invest could hurt productivity down the road, and make it harder to raise living standards. Peter Fisher, Treasury's Under Secretary for Domestic Finance, said on Thursday it was ``crucial'' that business investment spending rebound in the second half of the year.

SIGNS OF LIFE

``There are reasons to be optimistic,'' Fisher said in a speech to the Futures Industry Association in Boca Raton, Florida. ``In recent months shipments of non-defense capital goods have been increasing. Also, the passage of the stimulus bill that was just signed into law by President Bush will provide significant new incentives for corporate investment.''

Another positive sign has been the recent uptick in business lending by banks. So-called commercial and industrial loans have rebounded in recent weeks, according to weekly data from the Federal Reserve.

However, on Friday the Fed, in its monthly reading on U.S. industrial production, reported that output of business equipment declined 0.4 percent in February. That followed a meager 0.1 percent gain in January.

``The production of industrial and other equipment has been choppy recently, but, on balance, has continued to slide,'' the Fed said in the report.

LINKED TO PROFITS

The rebound in business spending will likely come, analysts say, when companies have some money to invest -- that is, when profits return. That could be soon, they say.

``We have seen corporate cash flow start to improve,'' said Gary Thayer, chief economist with St. Louis-based A.G. Edwards & Sons.

However, Thayer said firms are likely to wait until they are convinced that final demand, the consumer, is back on track before laying out cash.

That may delay a rebound in capital spending until the second or third quarter of the year, he said.

Lynn Reaser, chief economist with Banc of America Capital Management, also in St. Louis, said the run-up in bank lending may have been more closely related to firms financing their inventories rather than expansion plans.

``They still seem to be holding on to the purse strings,'' she said of executives.

Still, Reaser said she thought the lull in capital spending was close to bottoming out.