Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (2880)	3/15/2002 12:49:18 PM
From: Poet	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21057

Ouch! that I disrupted the phoney baloney lovefest here? What's up with you today? I think it's nice to be able to have fun and lighthearted posts on SI once in a while.

To: Bill who wrote (2880)	3/15/2002 12:49:46 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

Lovefest? Where? I hate it when I miss the good stuff.... <g>

To: Bill who wrote (2880)	3/15/2002 1:01:05 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 21057

So is your problem that I posted my opinion that X's recent proclamations were sanctimonious or that I disrupted the phoney baloney lovefest here? The latter. "Phoney baloney lovefest" is the essence of civilization. Why can't you just say "X, that sounded really sanctimonious, given your history" rather than "The stench of sanctimonious hypocrisy which oozes from your fingertips," for heaven's sake? And why the gratuitous implication that she's not fit to be around children? I said "the very first thing you posted" rather than "a clip from the very first post you posted" and you feel you have to call me a liar? At worst that was sloppy wording although it was clear what I meant. I really wish we could ratchet this language back a notch. Karen