SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: pyslent who wrote (115640)3/15/2002 8:22:35 PM
From: Art Bechhoefer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
I wouldn't mind paying the extra for high speed data access. The main problem I have is that there is no access to ANY wireless from my home, because of the hilly terrain and the rural area, where there aren't enough subscribers to encourage Verizon to provide even IS-95.

It is indeed bizarre that in order to use my wireless phone, I have to travel down the road about six miles in order to get in range of the nearest antenna. Being in a rural area, I am also forced to use a local ISP to reach the Internet. If I had wireless access to the Internet, I could eliminate the local ISP, making the additional wireless charge affordable. But it's all academic until they provide some service.

Art



To: pyslent who wrote (115640)3/15/2002 10:10:37 PM
From: Cooters  Respond to of 152472
 
I know that they are trying to recoup their cap ex, but when i say that i'd prefer to stay on a 14.4 kbs service rather than pay what they are charging for their 50 kbs service, that is a bad sign for future wireless web adoption.

Patience!

Let PCS deploy nationwide with their initial package of apps and pricing and then let's start hammering on the deficiencies.

The baby is still in the womb.

Cooters