Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lorne Larson who wrote (2872)	3/16/2002 2:43:21 AM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Respond to of 11633

I asked you a very simple question. Do you consider PWI a buy at its present price? I got the answer I knew I would get which is a whole lot of useless blather and egotistical chest-thumping. ---------------- You asked and I answered. Giving a clear indication and documented evidence of what I had said of PWI at the time you were bailing. My reasonings also were given clearly and documented in the referenced posts that I gave. Again # 2356 , # 2357 and even earlier at # 2320. They have not changed. They are the exactly the same now as then. In those posts I detailed exacting numbers of where to buy , where to hold , and where to just sit back and enjoy the income being distributed. Once again when confronted with evidence like that. You just pretend that it isn't there. That it doesn't exist. Well that evidence does exist. And you know what posters like J-R here have used it to decide for themselves what it is they are to do. And whose methodology they will be following. AND ITS NOT YOURS ---------------- Afraid to state a position, aren't you? ---------------- My position has never changed from day one. Its accumulate on weakness following a strategy laid out in post # 1998 and earlier in this thread. Using ranges set up from the very real past historical trading data indicating high ranges and low ranges for the trusts unit price. Then using these ranges to accumulate when unit prices are near or within lows and just enjoying the rise and the income near or within the highs. You just can't comprehend that because you are either just too stupid or too stubborn or both. For some strange reason you are under the false impression that it changes once it is started it does not. It remains the same from the first day it is started. ------------------- What a gutless fraud you are. ---------------- The only fraud is you. I still see that you refuse to even provide one bit of data or evidence to counter my going over your own numbers. Showing that you are no better off having sold at that loss and buying something else or worse being much worse as a result of it. Not once have you even gone over my numbers presented either in post # 1998 or in the case of PWI in post # 2357. To try to dispute them. You think that just by not responding to them. Then saying they are not there or that you don't like they way they are presented proves your case. It does not. Your whole avoidance of documented evidence like that is just laughable. And is seen by even the joe averages here for what it is. That you continue to do it time after time after time ad nauseum is even more laughable. But be my guest. Continue to do so. That more and more are providing documented evidence of its success here in the recent past with LLCF's last post to me # 2849 """"""""looks like we got through everything just fine as usual despite the nice [opportunities] sell off last year. They've all popped back nicely and I'm well above water before dividends""""""""""""""proves my case beyond any doubt. Unless of course your a complete moron. Which it seems you are. -----------------