Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : War -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (12704)	3/16/2002 12:52:10 AM
From: Carolyn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 23908

Yet still further proof of the evil of religious fanaticism. Such buffoons! Such pettiness! Such discrimination based on sex! Such hypocrisy!

To: D. Long who wrote (12704)	3/16/2002 4:55:19 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 23908

Re: Saudi police 'stopped' fire rescue Is this a real story or just another instance of crass yellow-journalism?? Granted, there was a fire. True, there were casualties... But I suggest we wait another day to hear what REALLY happened.

To: D. Long who wrote (12704)	3/16/2002 9:48:38 AM
From: hdl	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 23908

how come the police were allowed to see the girls if they were improperly covered? why don't they have scarves, protected and easily available, in case of an emergency, just as they should have fire extinguishers? the saudis may be true believers. an eternity in heaven for a soul outweighs death in a fire. when they have sex (on earth) i hope they aren't disappointed. the vast majoity of women i've been with haven't looked like playboy playmates and weren't as sexy as hollywood starlets. some guys always were on mescaline, lsd or something when they had sex. the saudis may really believe it is very special because their culture acts like they are teens with raging hormones and can't be allowed alone with a female or to see a leg, neckline or hair.