Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (238595)	3/16/2002 2:31:31 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Well, we can argue the difference between 'deregulated' and 'reregulated'. In truth, nothing is totally 'deregulated' in that all regulations are removed, it is a matter of degree. Before this 'reregulation', energy prices and supply were stable. Prices were steady. Price increases needed to be justified as needed. Energy prices were low by national standards. PG&E was well-run, and very customer-focussed for a large utility. After 'reregulation', the energy bandits took over. Gas supplies were manipulated, and prices shot through the roof. Electrical energy was hoarded, then released 'at the last minute' at horrific spot market prices. PG&E went from being a well-run public utility to a poorly run energy company, basically because they didn't know how to operate in the new environment. The promise was that energy prices would benefit from increased competition. The reality is that we were gouged, fleeced, and left for dead by greedy utility companies such as Enron. 'Reregulation' failed miserably in California. There may be some form of it that would be successful, but we're going be digging ourselves out of this for a long time thanks to 'free market economics'.