Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (238606)	3/16/2002 3:13:41 PM
From: Kevin Rose	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Well, we can continue the argument on semantics. Nothing is totally unregulated, except laws of physics and nature. There are always some ground rules, usually formalized as laws which regulate behavior and permissable actions. One of the assumptions in a theortically perfect 'free market economy' is that demand is not artifically regulated, either by government or suppliers. Given the high entry cost, the relative low number of players, and the greed of the industry, this basic free market tenet was not present. Suppliers manipulated availability because they knew there was no recourse, no alternate suppliers. Energy is a bad candidate for free market access, because it is not easily 'importable', cannot be stockpiled, has high entry cost, and a long lead-time for increasing capacity. If someone could invent affordable portable fusion sources, I would be all for complete free market 'unregulation' of the energy market. Until then, it is too easy to manipulate and fall prey to the inevitable Enrons of the world.