Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Twin Mining (formerly Twin-Gold) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Letmebe Frank who wrote (357)	3/17/2002 10:57:03 AM
From: Letmebe Frank	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 613

Here are some comments on the last few posts: teevee; Re: "more considerations including: size, overburden, location, logistics and probably royalties and taxes." I see no red flags in these additional considerations, do you? VAUGHN; Thanks - I understood a good part of what you said, but I never heard of "down to the Moho" or "Cliffords Rule" before. I looked for the phrase "Cliffords Rule" in Google, but came up blank. If you ever get time, maybe you can explain what the rule is. Your list of factors are a great summary of why TWG deserves more focus than its getting. Like you said, we will have a good idea of grade soon, and if its good, TWG will be a home run! Rocket Red: You old coot! When you show up, the excitement is sure to begin! When you say "Diamonds they have but not good enough to make a mine." you aren't fooling anyone here. I suspect you are "filling your boots" now, ready to spread the word when results come out. Welcome! Have a good Sunday.