Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Michael Bakunin who wrote (95104)	3/17/2002 4:03:38 PM
From: Joan Osland Graffius	Respond to of 132070

Michael, >>I am not buying here; given a 25%+ drop, ceteris paribus, I could change my tune. I would buy some more at your price. Did not buy this stock as a growth stock and would be an unhappy camper if they quit paying or lowered their dividend. <g> Have not done an exhaustive study of the increase in nuclear power plants world wide, but my sense is it is growing as China, Korea and Iran as well as other countries have plants under construction. It could be the same number of plants are being taken out of commission as are being build. The revenue for the company to invest in R&D can come from there other source - EPA as well as profit from the main source of revenue. It will be interesting to see what the financials look like after the recent restructuring. IMO, this industry needs to recycle the fuel and get rid of the storage problem. Sure would like to see the cost trade off of doing this. Suspect it would be an even trade off, but currently the cost to store comes out of the tax payers pocket and keeps the fuel cheaper for the operators. Doubt if Washington is going to change their ways anytime soon Joan