Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (45667)	3/17/2002 8:44:53 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Reality means nothing to you. You remind me (and others) of a sexually obsessed psychopathic stalker. Whose eyes are you writing for, anyway? Everyone here knows I made no toorabout with you separate from a deal that you'd leave poor Poet alone. Why would I? I have no objection whatever to you writing to me. I'm merely trying to protect a friend of mine, a woman with whom you are sexually (is the scary impression you give) obsessed, and whom you have threatened, and who is too frightened of you to defend herself. You know all this! Everyone knows all this! So you're writing either for someone else's eyes or as an excuse for the resumption of your cyberstalking of Poet. And you posted to her again today on IHub. Amazing. If you are so "honest and honorable" (hilarious), why have you broken your toorabout with Poet, who hasn't posted to or about you? Just wondrin', Mr. Honest, Mr. Honorable, Mr. Lies-About-Being-a-Minister-and-Lets-His-Friends-Defend-Him. You are an obfuscator, at best. (As you yourself admit): Message 17089431 And not only are you a self-proclaimed obfuscator, you are dumb as a rock to think it isn't clear that it isn't about you and me, it's about your fixation with my creeped-out friend Poet. How dysfunctional is it for you to write both: It had nothing to do with anything or anybody else. And "If you continue this, I will have to reveal information which I have resisted for a long time revealing, in order to prove that you are lying. But that information will not help Poet, and in fact may well hurt her. ? It's simple: Leave Poet alone, as you lyingly said you were doing in this post: Message 17182238 After writing which, when neither she nor I had breathed a word to or about you, you've written about her twice and to her once. Read my caps: IF YOU CAN RESIST THE TEMPTATION TO POST TO OR ABOUT HER AS YOU HAVE SAID YOU WOULD DO BUT ARE NOT DOING, YOU WILL NOT HEAR FROM ME OR HER AGAIN. WHY DID YOU POST ABOUT POET WHEN YOU SAID YOU WOULDN'T DO IT ANY MORE??? It's so simple. Or would be if when the urge to engage Poet seized you, you'd resist it. So simple. Resist the temptation. Resist it. All will be well, then. Is this why you can't figure this out? rense.com

To: The Philosopher who wrote (45667)	3/17/2002 9:05:39 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Here's another interesting sentence in that blackmail threat-post (the one saying if I refuse a toorabout with you, you will post (private, personal) things that may hurt Poet): Message 17179457 "Maybe you have enough self-control left to decide that you don't want Poet harassed *any more.*" Interesting both because it makes clear that the division you claim exists in your mind between your toorabouts with me and with Poet doesn't exist, and because of the admission contained in the bolded phrase above. Christopher Hodgkin: DON'T POST TO OR ABOUT POET AND ALL WILL BE WELL. LEAVE HER ALONE (and me alone) AND NEITHER SHE NOR I WILL EVER POST TO OR ABOUT YOU, AS WE THOUGHT YOU HAD AGREED.