Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (3288)	3/17/2002 9:01:02 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

I'm not convinced either. We started by postulating an invasion of Iraq. Of the 3 named in that axis, Iraq seems most likely and most deserving. Remember the UN weapons inspector fiasco? Do you think stability in that area is going to be increased if Iraq has nukes? Next Iran has to have them. And Israel's trigger finger gets itchier. I really don't think the Israelis will willingly lose Tel Aviv just because the US and other countries will be pissed if they use nukes in a preemptive strike.