Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dayuhan who wrote (3291)	3/17/2002 9:33:43 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

E's scenario assumed little or no involvement by Kurds, shiites, or anyone else. Message 17209214 I still think the Turks would be reluctant, simply because I don't think they see an invasion of Iraq as being in line with their interests. Simple marketing problem. We tell them they'll get a BETTER neighbor- -and WE guarantee it and their security. Which we already do, since they are part of NATO. Do I believe it can be done with 250K troops? Nope. The Gulf War took 500K and this is more ambitious. Is it a good idea? Getting rid of Saddam would be nice, but there's a potential for this thing to turn into a nightmare that makes Israel's Palestinian mess look good.