SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (239134)3/17/2002 8:47:09 PM
From: Selectric II  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Didn't Andrea Yates use a bath tub to perpetrate five crimes?

Sorry you haven't kept up on the news.

Imagine what she could have done with a swimming pool.

Why didn't she just use a gun?

Fill in that dangerous attractive nuisance, dude.

<edit>

I'm glad you see so little difference between a swimming pool and a gun. You didn't claim that a pool has any redeeming social value, just that one can and is used by criminals to perpetrate crimes, so we're making headway. You are wrong, however, because both can be, in the wrong hands. It's the actor that counts, but you don't seem to understand that yet.

Sorry for being so far above your head.



To: Kevin Rose who wrote (239134)3/17/2002 10:10:03 PM
From: ManyMoose  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Yeah, but the Bill of Rights doesn't say "The right of the people to keep and bear swimming pools shall not be infringed." Big difference if you are interested in maintaining constitutional rights, which you claim to be. Or were you fibbing when you wrote this: I, for one, would like to see us maintain the rights guaranteed by our Constitution


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News