Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kevin Rose who wrote (239141)	3/17/2002 8:29:05 PM
From: craig crawford	Respond to of 769670

>> Hmm, you don't see the connection between your comments about a converging, majority-rules view of morality where everyone conforms to a limited-rights singularity of thought for the good of the whole, and Soviet Russia? << no i don't. >> Comparing terrorists (which I do hate) to law abiding people who harm no one is quite a leap << comparing homosexuals to blacks, asians, hispanics seems like quite a leap to me, but you made it. >> Is that the sort of logic that you right wingers employ? << i was trying to use the type of low-level logic that you use, because you seem to understand that type best :) >> If you view the rights spelled out in the Constitution as privilege, fine << i told you, i don't mix rights with privileges. you were the one trying to do that. >> I, for one, would like to see us maintain the rights guaranteed by our Constitution << like i said, if gays only wanted the same rights as everyone else, there isn't a problem. they already enjoy them. but they seek special privileges, simply because of their lifestyle. like i said, if marriage is an uncompromising right and not a privilege, then i have to assume that everyone who consents should be allowed to marry. so i guess you don't have a problem with me marrying half of new york. if you tell me that marriage is only for couples, then i guess you shouldn't mind if i marry my grandfather! after all, i love my grandfather. there must be something in the constitution that guarantees me the right to marry him!