SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: dale_laroy who wrote (162441)3/18/2002 12:06:04 PM
From: AK2004  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Dale
double standards? You felt a need to correct me and yet when corrected failed to post to bmw and retract what you said to me
siliconinvestor.com



To: dale_laroy who wrote (162441)3/18/2002 12:11:15 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
One potential for AMD would be to reposition Clawhammer as a value segment processor, versus Celeron P4, while disabling the extra HTT link(s) of Sledgehammer to create a new desktop processor for the high end at 90nm. Such a processor, with 1MB of L2 cache and dual DDR SDRAM memory controllers, would be quite a match for Prescott.

Dale, that's quite a pessimistic view, for you to be already lowering your expectations for Clawhammer to be that of a Celeron P4 competitor, and requiring Sledgehammmer (which is later than Clawhammer, isn't it?) to compete with Prescott.

Tony



To: dale_laroy who wrote (162441)3/18/2002 12:53:36 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hyperthreading appears to be a non-issue, since it does not work without an MP capable OS, and can even degrade MP performance if the number of threads is greater than two per processor

You seem to be assuming that Intel will make no improvements to hyperthreading. Why is it that AMD can make improvements but Intel can't?

EP