SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Donkey's Inn -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mephisto who wrote (3321)3/18/2002 3:16:40 PM
From: Mephisto  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15516
 
Stop Sharon: Israel's leader has gone too far

Leader
Friday March 15, 2002
The Guardian

It is said that this week's Israeli incursions into the Palestinian
areas represent the country's biggest military operation for 20
years. This is an allusion to the 1982 invasion of Lebanon. The
same man who is forever associated with the notorious attacks
on the Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut at that time is also
behind the ongoing assaults on the refugee camps in the West
Bank and Gaza: Ariel Sharon. And his conduct now suggests
that he has learned little in the intervening period. Mr Sharon
always goes too far, always overreacts, always disregards the
consequences (and frequently the legality) of his actions; he
never looks beyond the short term.

He is running his country like
a platoon lieutenant ordered to pacify an enemy position.
Attaining that immediate objective appears to be all that matters
to him; he cannot see and seems not to comprehend the bigger
picture. Thus is he always surprised when, having won his
skirmish in habitually brutal fashion, he finds yet more
opponents waiting for him the next day, and the next. He has no
plan for tomorrow. But Mr Sharon knows, better than most, how
to turn today into a living hell.

That there are rights and wrongs on both sides of the
Palestinian-Israeli conflict is a truism. But chief among the
wrongs, perpetrated by both, is the constant, constantly futile
resort to violence.
There is no justification, no defence and no
mitigating factor powerful enough to excuse the depredations of
Palestinian suicide bombers in Israeli restaurants, discos and
other public places. There is no cause on earth that can
rightfully countenance the heinously immoral, murderously
deliberate targeting of mothers and their babies in Beit Israel in
west Jerusalem. There can be no legitimacy, no honour and no
lasting security for a Palestinian state founded on such gross
disregard for basic human decency.

In similar vein, however, there is no tenable justification, moral,
political or military, for Mr Sharon's armoured offensive into
heavily populated civilian areas of the Occupied Territories.
Mr
Sharon has sent his tanks (and British-made armour) into
Ramallah, Palestine's de facto capital; they should get out
immediately, not in phases. Mr Sharon has ordered
indiscriminate roundups of Palestinian men, corralling and
herding them, humiliating them and writing numbers on their
arms. That such things should be done in the name of the
Jewish people, of all peoples, is as stunning as it is shameful.
Mr Sharon sends his most advanced, American-supplied, F-16s
to bomb and destroy the headquarters, infrastructure and
administration, much of it funded by the European Union, of the
Palestinian Authority. Yet even while he hacks at the remaining
bloodied, screaming sinews of Palestinian statehood, he has the
nerve to demand that Yasser Arafat exercise greater control.

For sure, Israel has suffered, and is suffering, terribly. For sure,
it has a right of legitimate self-defence.
That is guaranteed by
the planet's most powerful country. But this week, as 20 years
ago, as so often in the past 12 months, Mr Sharon has gone too
far. He is beyond the pale. And he must be stopped. His Labour
defence minister tried to rein him in this week. Now, stopping Mr
Sharon, enforcing a total Israeli pullback and implementing a
ceasefire must be the top priority for the US envoy, Anthony
Zinni. For Israel's prime minister is no twisted teenage bomber
blinded by bloodshed, misery and vengeance. He is a head of
government. And of heads of government, far better is expected.
Mr Sharon's actions, now as in the past, reveal him as an
enemy to peace and to his own people.

guardian.co.uk



To: Mephisto who wrote (3321)3/18/2002 5:43:43 PM
From: Mephisto  Respond to of 15516
 
In Ramallah, Full Support for Attacks, Not a Truce
The New York Times

March 18, 2002

THE MOOD

By JOEL BRINKLEY

RAMALLAH, West Bank,
March 17 - It is hard to find
anyone here in this Palestinian
center who does not believe that
attacks should continue full force
against Israel, even as the United
States' special envoy pursues his
increasingly difficult task of
trying to achieve a cease-fire
between the two sides.


In fact, Palestinians say that Yasir
Arafat, their leader, has issued no
order in recent days to stop the
terror attacks and probably could
not enforce one in any case.
Numerous Palestinians, in
interviews today, showed no
remorse for the Israelis injured
and killed in today's attacks. The
opposite, in fact.

This suggests that even if General
Anthony C. Zinni succeeds in
bringing about a cease-fire
among the Israeli and Palestinian
leaders, Mr. Arafat would have a
difficult time bringing along the
rank and file even among his own
supporters. Numerous other
Palestinians, in Islamic Jihad,
Hamas and other militant
movements, hold no allegiance to
Mr. Arafat and his agreements.


Today's attack "boosted the
morale of our people," said Iyhab,
a Palestinian fighter who would
not give his full name, echoing
the sentiments of numerous
people interviewed here this
afternoon. He was referring to the
gunman who opened fire in the
central Israeli town of Kfar Saba
this afternoon, killing a high
school student and injuring
about a dozen other people.

Iyhab, a grim-faced 22-year-old, said he was an Arafat
loyalist; he was walking with the aid of a metal crutch
because of a gunshot wound to the leg he suffered in
fighting with Israeli troops here on Tuesday. He insisted
that he would not accept a cease-fire now, saying, "This is
the position of all the factions."

Abu Iyad, the chief of an intelligence unit in the
Palestinian security force, said today's attacks were "a
natural reaction to Israel's action - for every action there
is a reaction."

As he strode down a street in Ramallah, 20 armed men,
some in uniform, walked just behind him. "Arafat is not in
a position now to go to the people and ask for a cease-fire
until the Israelis end their incursion," he said.

Over the past week, Israeli troops have entered
Bethlehem, Ramallah and several Palestinian refugee
camps in areas that are supposed to be under Palestinian
control. Most of the soldiers have been pulled back, but
some still occupy parts of Bethlehem, where they
exchanged fire with Palestinians today, the outskirts of
Ramallah and some other areas. Dozens of Palestinians
have been shot and killed by Israeli troops in the past
week.

"Until this moment there has been no order for a
cease-fire," Mr. Iyad said. "It would be a difficult thing to
convince our people to stop our attacks until the other
side shows us something first." By that he apparently
meant complete withdrawal from Palestinian controlled
areas.

This afternoon, Yasir Abed Rabbo, the Palestinian
information minister, told Israel radio: "Why should we
give anything in return for an invasion? An invasion
should be stopped, and then we sit and talk about a
cease-fire."

The Israeli foreign minister, Shimon Peres, in a news
conference Saturday night, placed a similar demand upon
the Palestinians that he said would have to be met before
the rest of the troops would withdraw from Palestinian
controlled areas.

"We took a unilateral action to pull our troops back," he
said. Before the rest are pulled back, "we would like to see
some response from the Palestinians, an engagement to
prevent terror."

There was no such engagement today. In addition to the
Kfar Saba attack, a suicide bomber blew himself up in
Jerusalem, killing himself and injuring a bus driver.

All of that pleased people in Ramallah.

"If someone attacks your house, you defend yourself," said
Hamad Sulliman, who said he was a member of Tanzim,
the militant wing of Mr. Arafat's Fatah movement. "I am
telling you, I will not listen to any instructions from the
Palestinian Authority as long as Israel continues its
aggression. Only then will we talk about a cease-fire."

Others said they would not accept a cease-fire under any
circumstances.

"Internally, we are against any kind of cease-fire," said a
fighter named Tasir, who would not give his last name but
said he was a security officer for the Palestinian Authority.
Several of his armed colleagues stood by nodding as he
spoke.

"We are security people, and it is our responsibility to
implement orders," he said. "But we are not in a position
to implement any kind of cease-fire agreement. It is in our
blood, every one of us. We will continue fighting."

nytimes.com