Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (45699)	3/18/2002 5:56:24 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 82486

G'Night Laz. JLA

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (45699)	3/18/2002 6:25:05 PM
From: YlangYlangBreeze	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

I was warned after this post: Jeesh, Laz, I was just checking. I didn't say that you-know-who was So and So, though you drew that conclusion on your own. Interesting. Anyhow, you have my word. Icksnay on the outcastsnay. Message 17131244 Wherein joelle alienates everyone, w/o bias: So read my lips, smegma breath, "it was vulgar, it was abusive, but not simutaneously so." I don't trust you. I never have, I never will. Who knows when you will put words in my mouth, and "warn me" or arbitrarily exercise your authority again? Yeah I posted there, and it didn't take me long to get dumped on either. WTF difference does it make if Steven posts there? Is that supposed to give the thread credibility? You're trotting him out as a featured asset? Sure, I adore Steven, but it disgusts me to see you use him and his name that way. And certainly you're not calling karen one of ours? Are pat and I part of your Topp's 2002 Liberal Set? Are those the definitive LW's to you? Big whoopie that even you guys hate CH. He's about as difficult a right-off as newt was. And as if making a CH free thread makes you some how trustworthy, or <cough, choke> decent? WAY TOO F'N LITTLE TOO F'N late. For so long you guys stood by as the shit flew, blackmail, ganging up, lies. These were well known incidents. The details were stage-whispered across scores of PM's. You creeps didn't show the slightest hint of concern, and even seemed to elbow each other in the ribs and hyuk it up, or at least embraced the perpetrators in your right wing lair. Now in this case, when it's CH, you make a gesture, broadcast across all channels and at great volume, of cross partisan solidarity, and it rings hollow and false. If some lefties want to jump at this little bone thrown to us after huge of volumes of note passing, deal making, and alliance building that would seem very fifth grade, if it weren't for the depth of the depravity and scope of the the offenses that were ignored or endorsed through inaction in the past, well that says quite a bit about them.