Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (45740)	3/18/2002 7:17:21 PM
From: bonnuss_in_austin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

<<Pat? She doesn't consider herself RW>> You seem to like to speak for others, in a dimwit sort of way, to 'group up support.' For what and whom, I'm mystified. Do you have a clue about anything, really? Just curious. bia

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (45740)	3/19/2002 1:11:08 AM
From: YlangYlangBreeze	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Why do I think the BR was created? You mean why did I create it? Not as you describe, so it's clever of you to consult an expert. Nor under any agreement brokered. But since you ask, I talked about it a few times, felt that plowing through abortion debate was tedious, and set this thread up to keep down thread bloat at LWP. The threat to delete both treads came later, and was diverted through negotiation held with Bob, both in PM on this already existing thread. If you don't remember, I'll be happy to refresh your memory. I thought you were a weisenhheimer, but maybe you are an Alzheimer. Just because you can trot out libs that post there doesn't make them RW's, it just means they post as long as they maintain your good graces, which I don't trust. It's not about wallowing in bitterness. It's about fitting two or three decent acts into a larger context, and finding that I feel suspicious of your motives.