SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (21652)3/18/2002 7:11:45 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Respond to of 281500
 
Another example of being in love with a Perfectly Stupid Idea. In this case, the idea that US foreign policy is never about what in professes to be about, but is about profiting US multinational companies. Now, I won't say that this has never been true (much of our foreign policy in Latin America doesn't stand up to close examination), but it doesn't mean that it is always true.

You'd think the pundits pushing this view would at least take the time to inform themselves of the current state of the oil market. Nobody is threatening us with shortages; the market is in glut. So why the heck would we fight a war just for oil?



To: Ilaine who wrote (21652)3/18/2002 7:25:00 PM
From: unclewest  Respond to of 281500
 
The state of armchair punditry in this country is going to the dogs.

CB,
lot of truth in that statement at least for SI.

ROTFLOL

i suppose i'm a bit (insert phrase)...but i think attacking any defenseless humans anywhere with deadly gas, or attacking, looting, raping, pillaging and conquering a peaceful neighbor, or setting a huge oilfield ablaze, or attempting to assassinate the president of the USA, or exterminating large members of a population because they have opposing viewpoints are all good reasons to be taken down.

edit...and they all apply to saddam.



To: Ilaine who wrote (21652)3/18/2002 8:14:37 PM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 281500
 
The state of armchair punditry in this country is going to the dogs.

You think the state of professional punditry is any better? Personally, I'd feel somewhat better if Perle and Wolfowitz were in the professional pundit class, rather than the class of leakers to professional pundits, but that's just me.