Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI Nudist's Arena -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: thames_sider who wrote (286)	3/18/2002 7:18:55 PM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 493

I very much enjoy making Fe(VI) compounds, too. Also the V and IV ones. Very occasionally. Mainly I stick to VI.

To: thames_sider who wrote (286)	3/18/2002 7:59:27 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 493

once they work you know where the problems are Well, of course. Once they work, they don't have problems. Well, sort of. Almost. Except for the ones they still do have. At least programs don't have to have experiments written up afterwards Ah. But three is the lovely documentation. Which is what I'm doing now. When I can whip myself hard enough to make me do it. Which obviously isn't happening at this moment. Phosgene's easiest by heating Cl2 gas over carbon black in limited oxygen, or with CO gas. I'll remember that next time I need to synthesize a war gas. Never know when that might come in handy. My favourite quick experiment was making Fe(VI) compounds. Tell me more. This sounds like fun. My chemistry instructors were prigs and frowned on such things. I think we need to change the thread name to "Chem Lab". there are still two unidentified sub-uranics Let see, technitium and ??? (Can't remember that other one.) I've never seen element 86 called Niton before Cudda sworn that was radon. Oh well. Got it wrong. I think we're boring E.