SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scott Zion who wrote (19029)3/18/2002 8:41:48 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 34857
 
Hmm, why cannot these GSM operators do what Viterbi did, "set aside" 1/3 of the capacity for
data and then claim it doesn't take any voice capacity, as it already was taken???

Well, Viterbi did not do that, he is just smart, not fundamentally nor intellectually dishonest.

Ilmarinen

Interseting thing that TDMA (like in US-TDMA or GSM-TDMA??) has some "inherent" capacity
advantage over (TDMA-)GSM?? I thought US-TDMa was just to narrowband to be practically usable??

Great that there are great journalists at wireless week who kind of BLAST out these smart things..

"Lucent last year announced plans to integrate smart antennas and a proprietary
technology known as Bell Labs Layered Space-Time, or BLAST, in its 3G-ready
Flexent OneBTS base station."

Well, ok.. "A new CDMA voice vocoder, known as a selectable mode vocoder, could save
operators an additional 50% to 60% in capacity"

Interesting concept, to use CDMA in voice coding, must be something really orthogonal???
Maybe something invented for Mquerice and his code division clicking cockroaches, without
regular human vocal tracts??

Hmm..strange physics.. "Still, as Nokia's Lappalainen pointed out, the methods available to increase
capacity are limited by basic RF physics"

That is, is it common to have drop out, never understood anything, engineers becoming journalists at
wireless week??

(nothing personal, and journalists also have a task in life, just like clicking cockroaches, some
even compete with the best of standup comedians)



To: Scott Zion who wrote (19029)3/18/2002 8:57:46 PM
From: 49thMIMOMander  Respond to of 34857
 
Anyway, welcome to the thread... great link!!

Where is page 53

<33% more voice capacity than TDMA (see figure on page 53)>

Most sentences actually have some basic information in them, but it takes some real knowledge
of telecommunication and journalistic, telecomm politics to recognize it, IMNHO.

Ilmarinen.

<"Those are contractual commitments to us with really significant penalties," Clift said. "The more efficiently we use the spectrum, the more we have available for data. It's going to be an aberration as it consumes spectrum, and none of us knows how fast this will happen.">

Did the US old AMPS-TDMA license auctions have some clause on how many voice calls per
bandwidth, similar to radiolinks,etc, had to be reached??

Lost some of those aspects of that tragic 30kHz time, although it kept AMPS alive until even some few years
into the future for USA. (US-AMPS and US-TDMA are based on 30khz channels, and that is were they
still are)